It was an interesting question a friend of mine in tech asked me after we listened back to myself being on the Radio Five Live as their AI expert media guest to comment about the Prime Minister’s speech about AI.
Did he write it — or did AI?
As the unveiling of Rishi Sunak’s AI strategy continues to resonate around the world, one cannot help but wonder, who wrote that speech? Was it the brilliant political mind of Sunak himself, or the digital neurons of an inventive AI?
The answer may not be as clear-cut as one may think, given today’s advanced AI capabilities. Linguistic nuances, emotional resonance, and political savvy exhibited in the speech demonstrate human-like sophistication that could easily be the product of an AI.
To discern the truth, one could potentially employ AI text analysis tools. And I used two of the leading ones. To see if we got a fair answer. These tools are meant to be able to detect subtle patterns and anomalies that may indicate whether the author was human or machine.
Alternatively, of course, one could ask the question directly to Mr. Sunak or his team, but the intrigue lies in this uncertain boundary between human creativity and AI capability, a boundary that is becoming increasingly blurred. And also would they tell you the truth anyway? Anyhoo …
“The irony is the COMPUTER SAYS NO”.
“Not once but TWICE!”
The double irony being, of course, that AI detectors don’t work!!
As the AI teacher course will tell you… AI detectors, particularly those aimed at identifying instances of academic dishonesty like plagiarism or exam cheating, have come under scrutiny for their limitations and potential inaccuracies.
In short, they don’t work.
Which is why even Open AI have shut there’s down.
Firstly, AI detectors operate on predefined algorithms and cannot grasp the nuances of human behaviour, thus leading to inaccuracies — they may flag an honest mistake as cheating or overlook sophisticated plagiarism techniques.
Secondly, these algorithms can often be baised, as they are trained on specific data and may not take into account a variety of student experiences and education practices.
Lastly, reliance on AI detectors fosters a punitive educational environment centred around catching students out, rather than nurturing honesty and integrity.
By fostering open dialogue and clear expectations around academic integrity, teachers can create a more effective learning environment. Nevertheless, AI technology can serve as a tool in this endeavour, but should not be considered infallible or serve as a sole prevention method. Anyhoo…
Make up your own mind…
Here’s the transcript.
Good morning, everyone.
Thank you, Adrian. I’m delighted to be here at the Royal Society — the place where the story of modern science has been written for centuries.
Now, I’m unashamedly optimistic about the power of technology to make life better for everyone. So the easy speech for me to give, the one in my heart I really want to give, would be to tell you about all the incredible opportunities before us.
Just this morning, I was at Moorfields Eye Hospital. They’re using artificial intelligence to build a model that can look at a single picture of your eyes and not only diagnose blindness but predict heart attacks, strokes, or Parkinson’s. And that’s just the beginning.
I genuinely believe that technologies like AI will bring a transformation as far-reaching as the industrial revolution, the coming of electricity, or the birth of the internet. Now, as with every one of those waves of technology, AI will bring new knowledge, new opportunities for economic growth, new advances in human capability, and the chance to solve problems that we once thought were beyond us.
But like those waves, it also brings new dangers and new fears.
So the responsible thing for me to do, the right speech for me to make, is to address those fears head-on, giving you the peace of mind that we will keep you safe while making sure that you and your children have all the opportunities for a better future that AI can bring.
Now, doing the right thing, not the easy thing, means being honest with people about the risks from these technologies. So I won’t hide them from you. That’s why today, for the first time, we’ve taken the highly unusual step of publishing our analysis on the risks of AI, including an assessment by the UK intelligence communities.
These reports provide a stark warning. Get this wrong, an AI could make it easier to build chemical or biological weapons. Terrorist groups could use AI to spread fear and destruction on an even greater scale. Criminals could exploit AI for cyber attacks, disinformation, fraud, or even child sexual abuse.
And in the most unlikely but extreme cases, there is even the risk that humanity could lose control of AI completely, through the kind of AI sometimes referred to as superintelligence. Indeed, to quote the statement made earlier this year by hundreds of the world’s leading AI experts, mitigating the risk of extinction from AI should be a global priority alongside other societal scale risks such as pandemics and nuclear war.
Now, I want to be completely clear, this is not a risk that people need to be losing sleep over right now, and I don’t want to be alarmist. There is real debate about this. Some experts think it will never happen at all. But however uncertain and unlikely these risks are, if they did manifest themselves, the consequences would be incredibly serious.
And when so many of the biggest developers of this technology themselves warn of these risks, leaders have a responsibility to take them seriously and to act. And that’s what I’m doing today in three specific ways.
First, keeping you safe.
Right now, the only people testing the safety of AI are the very organisations developing it. Even they don’t always fully understand what their models could become capable of. And there are incentives, in part to compete to build the best models quickest, so we shouldn’t rely on them marking their own homework, as many of those working on this would themselves agree.
Not least because only governments can properly assess the risk to national security, and only nation-states have the power and legitimacy to keep their people safe. The UK’s answer is not to rush to regulate. This is a point of principle. We believe in innovation. It’s a hallmark of the British economy. So we will always have a presumption to encourage it, not to stifle it.
And in any case, how can we write laws that make sense for something that we don’t yet fully understand? So instead, we’re building world-leading capability to understand and evaluate the safety of AI models within government. To do that, we’ve already invested £100 million in a new task force, more funding for AI safety than any other country in the world.
And we’ve recruited some of the most respected and knowledgeable figures in the world of AI. So I’m completely confident in telling you that the UK is doing far more than any other country to keep you safe. And because of this, because of the unique steps we’ve already taken, we’re able to go even further today.
I can announce that we will establish the world’s first AI safety institute right here in the UK. It will advance the world’s knowledge of AI safety and it will carefully examine, evaluate, and test new types of AI so that we understand what each new model is capable of exploring all the risks from social harms like bias and misinformation through to the most extreme risks of all.
The British people should have peace of mind that we’re developing the most advanced protections for AI of any country in the world, doing what’s right and what’s necessary to keep you safe.
But AI doesn’t respect borders so we cannot do this alone. The second part of our plan is to host the world’s first-ever global AI safety summit next week at Bletchley Park, the iconic home of computer science.
We’re bringing together the world’s leading representatives from civil society to the companies pioneering AI and the countries most advanced in using it. And yes, we’ve invited China. Now, I know there are some who will say that they should have been excluded but there can be no serious strategy for AI without at least trying to engage all of the world’s leading AI powers.
That might not have been the easy thing to do but it was the right thing to do. So, what do we hope to achieve at next week’s summit?
Right now, we don’t have a shared understanding of the risks that we face, and without that, we can’t hope to work together to actually address them. That’s why we’ll push hard to agree on the first-ever international statement about the nature of these risks.
Yet, AI is developing at a breathtaking speed. Every new wave will become more advanced, better trained, with better chips and more computing power. So we need to make sure that as the risks evolve so does our shared understanding.
I believe we should take inspiration from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change which was set up to reach an international scientific consensus. So, next week I will propose that we establish a truly global expert panel, nominated by the countries and organisations attending, to publish a state of AI science report.
Now, of course, our efforts also depend on collaboration with the AI companies themselves. Uniquely in the world, those companies have already trusted the UK with privileged access to their models. That’s why the UK is so well placed to create the world’s first AI safety institute.
And at next week’s summit, I will work together with the companies and countries to deepen our partnerships. My vision and our ultimate goal should be towards a more international approach to safety where we collaborate with partners to ensure AI systems are safe before they are released.
And so to support this, we will make the work of our AI Safety Institute available to the world. That’s the right thing to do morally, in keeping with the UK’s historic role on the international stage. But it’s also the right thing economically for families and businesses up and down the country.
Because the future of AI is safe AI and by making the UK a global leader in safe AI we will attract even more of the jobs and new investment that will come from this new wave of technology.
And just think for a moment what that will mean for our country. The growth it will catalyse, the jobs it will create, the change it can deliver for the better.
And that’s the third part of our plan, to make sure that everyone in our country can benefit from the opportunities of AI.
And we’ve already got strong foundations, third in the world for tech, behind only the US and China. The best place in Europe to raise capital. All of the leading AI companies choosing the UK as their European headquarters. The most pro-investment tax regime, the most pro-entrepreneur visa regime to attract the world’s top talent and the education reforms to give our own young people the skills to succeed.
And we’re going to make it even easier for ambitious people with big ideas to start, grow and compete in the world of AI. And that’s not just about having the technical skills, but the raw computing power.
That’s why we’re investing almost a billion pounds in a supercomputer thousands of times faster than the one you have at home. And it’s why we’re investing two and a half billion pounds in quantum computers, which can be exponentially quicker than those computers still.
So, to understand this, consider how Google’s Sycamore quantum computer can solve a maths problem in 200 seconds that would take the world’s fastest supercomputer 10,000 years.
And as we invest more in our computing power, we will make it available for researchers and businesses as well as government, so that when the best entrepreneurs in the world think about where they want to start and scale their AI businesses, they choose the UK.
And finally, we must target our scientific effort towards what I think of as AI for good. Right across the Western world, we’re searching for answers to the question as to how we can improve and increase our productivity, because that’s the only long-term way to grow our economy and raise people’s living standards.
And in a million different ways across every aspect of our lives, AI can be that answer. In the public sector, we’re clamping down on benefit fraudsters, saving billions, and using AI as a co-pilot to help clear backlogs and radically speed up paperwork.
Just take, for example, the task of producing bundles for benefits tribunals. Before, a week’s work could produce around 11. Now, that takes less than an hour. And just imagine the benefits of that rolled out across the whole of government.
In the private sector, startups like Robin AI are revolutionizing the legal profession, writing contracts in minutes, saving businesses and customers time and money. London-based Wave is using sophisticated AI software to create a new generation of electric self-driving cars.
But more than all of this, AI can also help us solve some of the greatest social challenges of our time. It can help us finally achieve the promise of nuclear fusion, providing abundant, cheap, clean energy with virtually no emissions.
It can help us solve world hunger by making food cheaper and easier to grow, and preventing crop failures by accurately predicting when to plant, harvest or water your crops.
And AI could help find novel dementia treatments or develop vaccines for cancer. And that’s why today we’re investing a further £100 million to accelerate the use of AI on the most transformational breakthroughs in treatments for previously incurable diseases.
Now I believe nothing in our foreseeable future will be more transformative for our economy, our society and all our lives than this technology. But in this moment, it is also one of the greatest tests of leadership we face.
It would be easy to bury our heads in the sand and hope that it will turn out alright in the end. To decide it’s all too difficult, or that the risks of political failure are too great. To put short-term demands ahead of the long-term interests of the country.
But I won’t do that. I’ll do the right thing, not the easy thing. I’ll always be honest with you about the risks. And you can trust me to make the right long-term decisions, giving you the peace of mind that we will keep you safe, while making sure that you and your children have all the opportunities for a better future that AI can bring.
I feel an extraordinary sense of purpose when I think about why I came into politics, frankly why almost anyone comes into politics. It’s because we want to make life better for people, to give our children and grandchildren a better future.
And we strive hour after hour, policy after policy, just trying to make a difference. And yet, if harnessed in the right way, the power and possibility of this technology could dwarf anything any of us have achieved in a generation.
And that’s why I make no apology for being pro-technology. It’s why I want to seize every opportunity for our country to benefit in the way that I’m so convinced that it can. And it’s why I believe we can and should look to the future with optimism and hope.
Did Rishi really write his speech?
You decide and comment below…